Which Mining Trailing Cable Should You Choose: Type 63 or Type 66 for South African Mining Operations?

Compare Type 63 vs Type 66 mining trailing cables for South African mining operations. Learn voltage ratings, applications, and selection criteria for 1.9/3.3kV and 3.8/6.6kV cables.

Li.wang@Feichun Cable

7/8/20258 min read

Selecting the appropriate mining trailing cable is a critical decision that directly impacts operational efficiency, safety, and cost-effectiveness in South African mining operations. Two primary cable types dominate the medium-voltage mining sector: Type 63 and Type 66 cables, each designed for specific voltage applications and operational requirements.

The fundamental distinction between these cable types lies in their voltage ratings and corresponding applications. Type 63 cables operate at 1.9/3.3kV, making them suitable for lower medium-voltage applications, whilst Type 66 cables handle higher voltages at 3.8/6.6kV, designed for more demanding electrical systems. Understanding these differences is essential for mining engineers, electrical contractors, and procurement specialists responsible for electrical infrastructure decisions.

Both cable types share similar construction philosophies, incorporating EPR (Ethylene Propylene Rubber) insulation and CR (Polychloroprene Rubber) sheathing systems designed to withstand the harsh conditions of South African mining environments. However, their specific design characteristics, electrical performance parameters, and application suitability differ significantly, requiring careful consideration during the selection process.

This comprehensive comparison examines the technical specifications, applications, and selection criteria for both cable types, providing mining professionals with the information necessary to make informed decisions. The choice between Type 63 and Type 66 cables affects not only immediate installation costs but also long-term operational reliability, maintenance requirements, and overall system performance.

Background on Mining Trailing Cables

Mining trailing cables represent a specialised category of electrical conductors engineered specifically for the demanding requirements of mining operations. These cables must provide reliable power transmission whilst accommodating the constant movement, mechanical stress, and environmental challenges characteristic of both opencast and underground mining environments.

Construction Philosophy and Design Principles

Both Type 63 and Type 66 cables follow similar construction principles, incorporating Class 5 flexible stranded tinned annealed copper conductors to provide excellent electrical conductivity combined with the flexibility required for trailing applications. The tinned copper construction enhances corrosion resistance, particularly important in humid underground environments and exposure to mining chemicals.

The insulation system utilises EPR (Ethylene Propylene Rubber), a thermosetting compound that provides excellent electrical properties, temperature stability, and resistance to environmental factors. This insulation material maintains its characteristics under temperature variations and mechanical stress, ensuring reliable performance throughout the cable's operational life.

Screening and Protection Systems

Both cable types incorporate nylon/tinned copper wire braiding for each power core, providing electrical screening and effective earthing capabilities. This screening system offers electromagnetic interference protection whilst ensuring adequate fault current paths for safe operation. The three-phase power cores are laid up in right-hand lay around a rubber (RD1) filler centre, alongside unscreened pilot cores for control signal transmission.

The dual sheath system features CR (Polychloroprene Rubber) inner and outer sheaths bonded together for additional torsional protection. This construction provides excellent mechanical protection, chemical resistance, and moisture exclusion whilst maintaining the flexibility required for trailing applications. Open nylon braid reinforcement with minimum 16 strings provides additional mechanical strength between the sheath layers.

Environmental Resistance Characteristics

Mining trailing cables must withstand exposure to various environmental factors including sunlight, UV radiation, oils, and abrasive materials. Both Type 63 and Type 66 cables demonstrate excellent resistance to these factors, making them suitable for the challenging conditions encountered in opencast and sub-surface mining operations. The CR sheathing material provides superior resistance to ozone, weathering, and chemical exposure commonly found in mining environments.

Key Differences Between Type 63 and Type 66 Cables

The primary distinctions between Type 63 and Type 66 cables centre around their voltage ratings and corresponding electrical performance characteristics, which directly influence their applications and suitability for different mining operations.

Voltage Rating Differences

Type 63 cables operate at 1.9/3.3kV, where 1.9kV represents the voltage rating phase-to-earth (Uo) and 3.3kV represents the voltage rating phase-to-phase (U). This voltage rating makes Type 63 cables suitable for lower medium-voltage applications commonly found in smaller mining equipment and auxiliary systems.

Type 66 cables handle higher voltages at 3.8/6.6kV, with 3.8kV phase-to-earth and 6.6kV phase-to-phase ratings. This higher voltage capability enables Type 66 cables to handle larger electrical loads and longer transmission distances, making them suitable for major mining equipment and primary distribution systems.

Electrical Performance Characteristics

The higher voltage rating of Type 66 cables necessitates enhanced insulation thickness and improved electrical performance characteristics. Whilst both cable types utilise identical conductor materials and construction methods, Type 66 cables feature increased insulation wall thickness to accommodate the higher electrical stress levels associated with elevated voltages.

Current-carrying capacity varies between the two types, with Type 66 cables typically demonstrating higher current ratings for equivalent conductor sizes due to improved heat dissipation characteristics resulting from the thicker insulation system. This enhanced current capacity enables Type 66 cables to handle larger electrical loads efficiently.

Construction and Dimensional Differences

Whilst both cable types share similar construction methodologies, Type 66 cables feature increased overall dimensions to accommodate the enhanced insulation requirements. The thicker insulation system and potentially larger conductor sizes result in greater cable diameters and weights, which may influence installation considerations and mechanical handling requirements.

The pilot core configurations may differ between the two types, with Type 66 cables potentially requiring larger pilot cores to accommodate the increased control signal requirements associated with higher-voltage equipment. However, both types maintain the same fundamental pilot core design principles.

Cost Considerations

Type 66 cables typically command higher prices compared to Type 63 cables due to increased material requirements, enhanced manufacturing complexity, and more stringent quality control procedures. The additional insulation material, larger overall dimensions, and enhanced testing requirements contribute to the cost differential between the two cable types.

Applications and Suitability

Understanding the specific applications and operational scenarios where each cable type excels is crucial for making informed selection decisions in South African mining operations.

Specific Use Cases for Type 63 Cables

Type 63 cables with their 1.9/3.3kV rating are ideally suited for medium-sized mining equipment and auxiliary systems where lower voltage operation is appropriate. These applications include smaller draglines, section feeders, and drilling equipment commonly found in opencast mining operations.

Underground mining operations frequently utilise Type 63 cables for Load Haul Dump (LHD) vehicles, shuttle cars, and mobile equipment where the voltage rating provides adequate power transmission capability whilst maintaining safety margins appropriate for confined spaces. The current ratings available, ranging from 130A to 520A depending on conductor size, accommodate most medium-scale mining equipment requirements.

Auxiliary systems including ventilation fans, pumping equipment, and lighting systems benefit from Type 63 cables' cost-effectiveness and appropriate voltage rating. These applications typically require reliable power transmission without the higher voltage capabilities of Type 66 cables, making Type 63 the economical choice.

Portable equipment used in hazardous areas, including gas-prone zones in coal mining operations, utilises Type 63 cables due to their appropriate voltage rating and robust construction. The lower voltage reduces potential hazards whilst maintaining adequate power transmission capabilities.

Specific Use Cases for Type 66 Cables

Type 66 cables with their 3.8/6.6kV rating are designed for larger mining equipment and primary distribution systems requiring higher voltage operation. Large draglines, electric shovels, and major conveyor systems benefit from the increased power transmission capability and efficiency provided by higher voltage operation.

Long-distance power transmission within mining operations often requires Type 66 cables to minimise voltage drop and maintain electrical efficiency. The higher voltage rating enables effective power transmission over extended distances commonly encountered in large opencast mining operations.

High-powered underground equipment including large continuous miners, longwall systems, and major pumping stations utilise Type 66 cables to accommodate their substantial power requirements. The increased current-carrying capacity and voltage rating provide the electrical performance necessary for these demanding applications.

Primary distribution systems supplying power to multiple mining operations or large mining complexes benefit from Type 66 cables' higher voltage rating and enhanced electrical performance. These systems require the additional capability to handle diverse load requirements and maintain stable voltage levels.

Examples of Mining Operations Benefiting from Each Cable Type

Coal mining operations frequently employ Type 63 cables for underground equipment including continuous miners, shuttle cars, and roof bolters, where the voltage rating provides adequate power transmission whilst maintaining safety in potentially explosive atmospheres. The lower voltage reduces arc flash risks and simplifies safety procedures.

Large opencast iron ore and platinum mining operations utilise Type 66 cables for major equipment including large electric shovels, draglines, and primary conveyor systems. The higher voltage enables efficient power transmission to these substantial pieces of equipment whilst maintaining operational reliability.

Gold mining operations employ both cable types depending on specific requirements. Type 63 cables serve underground equipment and auxiliary systems, whilst Type 66 cables handle surface equipment and primary distribution systems. This mixed approach optimises both performance and cost-effectiveness.

Factors Influencing Cable Selection

Several critical factors must be considered when selecting between Type 63 and Type 66 cables for mining applications, ensuring optimal performance, safety, and cost-effectiveness.

Electrical System Requirements

The existing electrical system voltage and design parameters represent the primary selection criteria. Mining operations with established 1.9/3.3kV systems benefit from Type 63 cables' compatibility, whilst 3.8/6.6kV systems require Type 66 cables. System voltage standardisation reduces complexity and maintenance requirements whilst ensuring compatible spare parts availability.

Equipment power requirements influence cable selection significantly. Lower-powered equipment operates efficiently with Type 63 cables, whilst high-powered equipment requires Type 66 cables' enhanced current-carrying capacity and voltage rating. Accurate load calculations ensure appropriate cable selection and prevent performance limitations.

Distance and Voltage Drop Considerations

Power transmission distance affects cable selection decisions significantly. Type 63 cables suit shorter transmission distances where voltage drop remains within acceptable limits, whilst Type 66 cables enable longer transmission distances with reduced voltage drop and improved efficiency. Voltage drop calculations must consider conductor size, distance, and load requirements.

Future expansion plans should influence cable selection decisions. Type 66 cables provide greater capacity for future load growth and system expansion, whilst Type 63 cables may require replacement or supplementation as operations expand. Long-term planning reduces future modification costs and system disruption.

Safety and Regulatory Requirements

Mining safety regulations and hazardous area classifications influence cable selection decisions. Type 63 cables' lower voltage rating may be preferred in certain hazardous locations, whilst Type 66 cables' higher voltage requires enhanced safety procedures and equipment. Regulatory compliance ensures safe operation and avoids potential penalties.

Personnel training and competency requirements differ between voltage levels. Type 63 systems typically require less specialised training, whilst Type 66 systems demand higher competency levels and enhanced safety procedures. Training costs and availability should be considered during selection.

Economic Considerations

Initial cable costs represent only one component of total ownership costs. Type 66 cables command higher purchase prices but may provide better long-term value through improved efficiency and reduced electrical losses. Total cost of ownership analysis should consider purchase price, installation costs, maintenance requirements, and operational efficiency.

Installation complexity and costs vary between cable types. Type 66 cables' larger dimensions and weight may require enhanced support systems and installation equipment, increasing project costs. Installation planning must accommodate these requirements during budget development.

Conclusion

The selection between Type 63 and Type 66 mining trailing cables requires careful consideration of multiple factors including electrical system requirements, equipment specifications, safety considerations, and economic factors. Type 63 cables with their 1.9/3.3kV rating serve medium-scale mining equipment and auxiliary systems effectively, providing cost-effective power transmission with appropriate safety margins.

Type 66 cables with their 3.8/6.6kV rating address the requirements of larger mining equipment and primary distribution systems, offering enhanced power transmission capability and improved efficiency for demanding applications. The higher voltage rating enables effective power transmission over extended distances whilst accommodating substantial electrical loads.

Both cable types share similar construction principles incorporating EPR insulation and CR sheathing systems designed for mining environments. Their robust construction ensures reliable performance under the challenging conditions encountered in South African mining operations, including exposure to mechanical stress, environmental factors, and chemical substances.

The decision between Type 63 and Type 66 cables should be based on comprehensive analysis of electrical system requirements, equipment specifications, safety considerations, and long-term operational plans. Professional consultation with electrical engineers and mining specialists ensures optimal cable selection and system performance.

Investment in appropriate cable selection contributes to operational efficiency, safety, and long-term cost-effectiveness in South African mining operations. Understanding the capabilities and limitations of each cable type enables informed decision-making that supports successful mining operations whilst maintaining the highest safety standards.